🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have harvested millions of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to release them online.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the apparent data breach could boost AI companies searching for material to develop their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Declared Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be used for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between artists, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.